use core::str; use saphyr_parser::{Event, Parser, ScanError}; /// Run the parser through the string. /// /// The parser is run through both the `StrInput` and `BufferedInput` variants. The resulting /// events are then compared and must match. /// /// # Returns /// This function returns the events if parsing succeeds, the error the parser returned otherwise. /// /// # Panics /// This function panics if there is a mismatch between the 2 parser invocations with the different /// input traits. fn run_parser(input: &str) -> Result, ScanError> { let mut str_events = vec![]; let mut iter_events = vec![]; for x in Parser::new_from_str(input) { str_events.push(x?.0); } for x in Parser::new_from_iter(input.chars()) { iter_events.push(x?.0); } assert_eq!(str_events, iter_events); Ok(str_events) } #[test] fn fuzz_1() { // Crashing with an index out-of-bounds error. // In `scan_plain_scalar`, we would lookahead 1 and call `skip_break`, which requires a // lookahead of 2. let raw_input: &[u8] = &[ 1, 39, 110, 117, 108, 108, 34, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 10, 13, 13, 13, 13, ]; let s = str::from_utf8(raw_input).unwrap(); let _ = run_parser(s); } #[test] fn fuzz_2() { // Crashing with an unwrap of a None value. // There is an imbalance of implicit flow mapping contexts here between the opening `[`/`{` and // closing `]`/`}`. We would test against flow-level when only `[` can create implicit flow // mappings. let raw_input: &[u8] = &[ 91, 91, 32, 101, 58, 9, 123, 63, 32, 45, 106, 101, 58, 9, 123, 63, 32, 44, 117, 101, 58, 9, 123, 63, 32, 44, 9, 26, 58, 32, 126, 93, 8, 58, 32, 58, 10, 29, 58, 58, 58, 32, 58, 29, 63, 32, 44, 9, 26, 58, 32, 126, 93, 8, 58, 32, 58, 10, 78, 32, ]; let s = str::from_utf8(raw_input).unwrap(); let _ = run_parser(s); }